3 ms·

I'm referring to your comment that he quoted - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 Maybe you're misreme

I'm referring to your comment that he quoted - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 Maybe you're misremembering - but you wrote it :)

MichaelZuo 3y ago
> I'm referring to your comment that he quoted - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 Maybe you're misremembering - but you wrote it :) 'johnklos' did not quote a single word from anyone in the comment I linked, nor a single word from my original comment you linked, let alone an entire phrase, and that was the only response he made from what I can see. Are you confusing him with a different HN user? You don't have to believe me, it's accessible to every passing reader right there in the comment chain...
- warrenm 3y ago
  I have to believe you're attempting (but failing) to gaslight me you wrote: "it does seem to indicate that IPv6 is mostly pointless for human users for exactly this reason" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359) he wrote: "If you think IPv6 is mostly pointless, I think you're unaware of the fact that a significant majority of phones already use IPv6 most of the time they're on cellular" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37051011 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37051011) As you so helpfully put it, "You don't have to believe me, it's accessible to every passing reader right there in the comment chain..." (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37056142 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37056142) Feel free to continue to deny what you wrote, how he responded, and me repeatedly showing you where quotes your words if you want - no one stop you from ignoring your own words (eventhough they're right there on display for all) ...but he used your own words in response to your own comment :)
  - MichaelZuo 3y ago
    What are you on about? There's no sign of 'johnklos' quoting me as you claim. It literally appears in his own words, and he even wrote it in a manner that could not possibly be confused with my style of writing. Just check my recent comment history? Frankly, it's just impossible for there to be a 17 word phrase in that comment that can be interpreted as a quotation, even by a teenager who only started learning English. And in any case, you are free to contact dang, or any other HN user you trust, and ask them to double check whether such a thing occurred. You can also review HN norms, other examples of HN users quoting each other and explicitly acknowledging it, the popular dictionary definitions of 'quote', etc... Since your HN account is nearly 11 years old I'm fairly confident you know various methods to verify these things to a reasonable degree of certainty.
    - p1mrx 3y ago
      Please accept this award for your outstanding contributions to the field of pedantry.
      - MichaelZuo 3y ago
        Since presumably your a different person from 'warrenm', though with some degree of uncertainty due to the pseudonym, why lower your account's built up credibility with obvious low-effort trolling? 'warrenm' clearly needs some help with resolving confusion regarding HN norms, or something along those lines, not piling on and exploiting the odd comment chain at his expense.
      - warrenm 3y ago
        this MichaelZuo character seems to be pretty lost in understanding how to communicate (and then denying he's doing what he's actively doing) I think he's in it for the humor value
        p1mrx 3y ago
        MichaelZuo is defending an unnecessarily precise definition of the word "quote" and you are refusing to acknowledge it. I doubt that either of you are in this for the humor; that simply emerges from the duration and pointlessness of the argument.

I'm referring to your comment that he quoted - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 Maybe you're misremembering - but you wrote it :)

MichaelZuo 3y ago

> I'm referring to your comment that he quoted - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 Maybe you're misremembering - but you wrote it :) 'johnklos' did not quote a single word from anyone in the comment I linked, nor a single word from my original comment you linked, let alone an entire phrase, and that was the only response he made from what I can see. Are you confusing him with a different HN user? You don't have to believe me, it's accessible to every passing reader right there in the comment chain...

warrenm 3y ago
I have to believe you're attempting (but failing) to gaslight me you wrote: "it does seem to indicate that IPv6 is mostly pointless for human users for exactly this reason" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37050359) he wrote: "If you think IPv6 is mostly pointless, I think you're unaware of the fact that a significant majority of phones already use IPv6 most of the time they're on cellular" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37051011 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37051011) As you so helpfully put it, "You don't have to believe me, it's accessible to every passing reader right there in the comment chain..." (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37056142 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37056142) Feel free to continue to deny what you wrote, how he responded, and me repeatedly showing you where quotes your words if you want - no one stop you from ignoring your own words (eventhough they're right there on display for all) ...but he used your own words in response to your own comment :)
- MichaelZuo 3y ago
  What are you on about? There's no sign of 'johnklos' quoting me as you claim. It literally appears in his own words, and he even wrote it in a manner that could not possibly be confused with my style of writing. Just check my recent comment history? Frankly, it's just impossible for there to be a 17 word phrase in that comment that can be interpreted as a quotation, even by a teenager who only started learning English. And in any case, you are free to contact dang, or any other HN user you trust, and ask them to double check whether such a thing occurred. You can also review HN norms, other examples of HN users quoting each other and explicitly acknowledging it, the popular dictionary definitions of 'quote', etc... Since your HN account is nearly 11 years old I'm fairly confident you know various methods to verify these things to a reasonable degree of certainty.
  - p1mrx 3y ago
    Please accept this award for your outstanding contributions to the field of pedantry.
    - MichaelZuo 3y ago
      Since presumably your a different person from 'warrenm', though with some degree of uncertainty due to the pseudonym, why lower your account's built up credibility with obvious low-effort trolling? 'warrenm' clearly needs some help with resolving confusion regarding HN norms, or something along those lines, not piling on and exploiting the odd comment chain at his expense.
    - warrenm 3y ago
      this MichaelZuo character seems to be pretty lost in understanding how to communicate (and then denying he's doing what he's actively doing) I think he's in it for the humor value
      - p1mrx 3y ago
        MichaelZuo is defending an unnecessarily precise definition of the word "quote" and you are refusing to acknowledge it. I doubt that either of you are in this for the humor; that simply emerges from the duration and pointlessness of the argument.