OpenBSD is an existence proof of a third route: Carefully manage complexity, and write a good manual. OpenBSD is about 22M lines of code; kubernetes is 58M, s

OpenBSD is an existence proof of a third route: Carefully manage complexity, and write a good manual. OpenBSD is about 22M lines of code; kubernetes is 58M, so the code bases are of comparable complexity (OpenBSD uses many more programming languages than kubernetes does). I'd argue that the base OpenBSD install provides far more utility than Kubernetes, but market share numbers disagree. Sources: https://openhub.net/p/kubernetes https://openhub.net/p/kubernetes https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/d9a8c9/how_many_lines_of_code_does_openbsd_65_contain/?rdt=50542 https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/d9a8c9/how_many_li... Edit: Using open hub for both says OpenBSD is 75M lines: https://openhub.net/p/openbsd https://openhub.net/p/openbsd