2 ms·
To me the report seems very vague as to whether the details were exposed by accident or as the result of an attack. Like, the organisation is trying to make it
by tempaway25755 3y ago
To me the report seems very vague as to whether the details were exposed by accident or as the result of an attack. Like, the organisation is trying to make it _sound_ like it was the result of an attack, but they seem to know very little about it so that makes me suspicious.
- willprice89 3y ago> It said the attack had “used a sophisticated infiltration method, intended to evade our checks”, which was why it had taken so long to detect. They seem pretty clear that it was an attack rather than accident, but I agree the details seem intentionally vague. Maybe it wasn't quite that sophisticated after all...
- bennyelv 3y agoYou can almost guarantee that. Even if they don’t want to share it, a Freedom of Information request will force them to.