The issue is not whether someone knows the links are clickable or not. The issues were raised upthread: > They lay out the theft, public reaction, some art his

The issue is not whether someone knows the links are clickable or not. The issues were raised upthread: > They lay out the theft, public reaction, some art history, then not a single word on how it resloved, who actually took it and how it was found. The only hint was "an antique dealer got a letter". It's lazy to not include enough information to make a coherent article. Links in this context are for further information, not for basic information needed to understand the article.