4 ms·
Weird argument but okay, then increase tax past say 100k/employed person in company of revenue. Or tax on revenue once company becomes big enough. Taxing on in
by ilyt 3y ago
Weird argument but okay, then increase tax past say 100k/employed person in company of revenue.
Or tax on revenue once company becomes big enough. Taxing on income made sense to make investing into expansion a good thing, but those companies clearly don't need to be bigger, it seems to just make stuff worse and worse.
- gruez 3y ago>then increase tax past say 100k/employed person in company of revenue. That would cover most professional services firms (eg. lawyers/accountants). I don't really see why they should be considered worse than a mcdonalds. >Taxing on income made sense to make investing into expansion a good thing, but those companies clearly don't need to be bigger, it seems to just make stuff worse and worse. TSMC brings in 73.67 billion/year in revenue. Equifax only brings in 5.12 billion/year. Which one is making stuff "worse and worse"? Surely there's a better metric than dollar amounts, which totally ignore the financial nature of the underlying industry?