If I take it as axiomatic that Tesla's approach carries a higher level of mortal risk, and I boil this down in a reductive way, I interpret you as saying: it's

If I take it as axiomatic that Tesla's approach carries a higher level of mortal risk, and I boil this down in a reductive way, I interpret you as saying: it's better to increase the loss of life and limb than slow auto traffic. How do you square that ethically?