3 ms·
It would be interesting to try and make that work. It sounds like basically you'd define a monopsony as effectively an employer relationship, rather than a con
by rootusrootus 3y ago
It would be interesting to try and make that work. It sounds like basically you'd define a monopsony as effectively an employer relationship, rather than a contractual one. But there are lots of regular everyday businesses that work together in a monopsony relationship. Should we force all of them to consolidate into a single business entity? Or does this only happen for larger companies? Or only gig-style companies?