4 ms·
Some of the things they're asking for are beyond absurd. How does someone work at the FBI and not realize that asking Google for a user's SS# or detailed browsi
by drivebyacct2 15y ago
Some of the things they're asking for are beyond absurd. How does someone work at the FBI and not realize that asking Google for a user's SS# or detailed browsing logs not realistic?
- rdtsc 15y agoOften enough if someone is smart enough to even realize such things they wouldn't be working for the government. And if you deal with the government you start seeing this kind of stupidity quite often. I am sure you'll see in any large bureaucratic structure (private too) it is just the govt is the largest one of all.
- potshot 15y agoIANAL, but I'm assuming Google doesn't have to hand over anything that's not explicitly listed in the warrant. If you're the FBI, you might as well ask for the world and see what you get back.
- rprasad 15y agoIt's not about being realistic, it's about finding out what sort of information Google retains about its users. Low-profile cases are the best times to test these sorts of fishing expeditions because attention and resistance to teh subpoena will be low. (In contrast, in a high-profile case, the defendant is likely to vigorously oppose any such attempt.) In other words: The FBI doesn't care if they actually get the information in this case; they want to know if they'll be able to get such information in future, more important cases.