My friend is a private jet pilot, but also partially trained for commercial jets. He says that the article content is a nonsense. Here's his words, translated:

My friend is a private jet pilot, but also partially trained for commercial jets. He says that the article content is a nonsense. Here's his words, translated: The plane is always using brakes. Reverse thrust reduces landing distance by about 15%, and its main task is to reduce the load on the brakes and prevent overheating of the pads (which lose their effectiveness at high temperatures) and wheels (which would otherwise blow the fuse and release air from them, to prevent explosive destruction). All landing distances that are indicated in the manual and that are calculated by the [onboard] computer are calculated for serviceable brakes and WITHOUT taking into account the use of reverse thrust. With “brakes disabled” - how can you be sure that you will stop within a runway of a given length? There is no such data, no one has tested it. There are procedures for brake failure, but this is an emergency, there are no landing distances for these procedures, and in any case, pads are still used for emergency braking (it’s just that compressed air/nitrogen is supplied to their actuators instead of hydraulic fluid).