> But after looking at other source control options Genuinely curious: what other VCS are you referencing here? Personally, I have not used many, but of the t

> But after looking at other source control options Genuinely curious: what other VCS are you referencing here? Personally, I have not used many, but of the total of three that I have used, Git is the hardest. I've used SVN and I will start by saying that Git is objectively better. But that "better" is a balance between ease-of-use and features/power. SVN is much much nicer to use than Git in certain (admittedly narrow) contexts. To be more specific, the SVN (cli) user interface is a lot nicer to use than Git's. Merge conflict resolution is improved in Git, and decentralisation is pretty useful - the ability to setup a local repo and persist changes to disk immediately with no remote is essential in modern version control. These things make Git better but it is not easier to use. Then of course there's Mercurial: somehow delivers on all the things Git has over SVN while still being almost as easy to use as SVN. No competition here.