Honestly, seems like the problem with wcwidth's implementations. Most of them have been reporting almost all emojis as having width 1 (and some very non-invisib

Honestly, seems like the problem with wcwidth's implementations. Most of them have been reporting almost all emojis as having width 1 (and some very non-invisible symbols as having with 0) for years, to this very day, for some unexplained reason despite regular web rants of how this is wrong. Check out this one: [0]. It's 8 years old! The problems are still there. [0] https://eev.ee/blog/2015/09/12/dark-corners-of-unicode/#combining-characters-and-character-width https://eev.ee/blog/2015/09/12/dark-corners-of-unicode/#comb...