I didn't draw conclusions about this specific instance. Consequences should exist, and should be a deterrence against unsafe behaviour no matter the party. Con

I didn't draw conclusions about this specific instance. Consequences should exist, and should be a deterrence against unsafe behaviour no matter the party. Consequences for corporations should be more significant than for individuals IMHO. If Uber contributed to this in their training of their safety driver, the equipment in use, disabling built-in safety features, and so forth... then they should have penalties severe enough to adjust their behaviour too. My thinking is that the more vulnerable a road user, the greater the ownership is on the less vulnerable, meaning the greater the consequences of their choices. What I didn't do is limit "their" to just a driver / safety driver.