4 ms·

When I say ideology, I'm referring moreso to both dogma and bruised egos, both of which the GNU project is rife with. A lot of Hurds continued development is j

When I say ideology, I'm referring moreso to both dogma and bruised egos, both of which the GNU project is rife with. A lot of Hurds continued development is just predicated on "we don't want to admit Linux became a success" rather than any serious principles or ethics. Again, just look at the whole start-stop nature of its development. I don't disagree that a lot of tech professionals could spare at least some basic regards for the ethics surrounding the software they create, but you're not gonna find that at the GNU project.

medo-bear 3y ago
> When I say ideology, I'm referring moreso to both dogma and bruised egos, both of which the GNU project is rife with. Then just say I don't like that Hurd is part of the GNU Project because I dont like what the latter does. In my opinion, it is very hard to deny that GNU Project / FSF take principles and ethics of software development very seriously. Some people even call them dogmatic for it.