4 ms·
Well, currently the top LLM fails at repeatedly generating a stable set of pretty simple regexes for me, so where pretty far from a full-blown LLM dystopia at t
by waihtis 3y ago
Well, currently the top LLM fails at repeatedly generating a stable set of pretty simple regexes for me, so where pretty far from a full-blown LLM dystopia at this point.
- mavhc 3y agoThe question is does the rapid progress in LLMs continue over the next few years, or do we reach another local maximum. Is "currently" going to improve rapidly?
- waihtis 3y agoas I understand we're approaching local maximum with LLMs and that is what I base the previous comment on, but fully layman and no insight into deeper layers of LLM R&D
- sznio 3y agoLLMs are too dumb to be useful, but smart enough to be destructive. You don't need to be able to generate correct regexes to create a blogspam article about regexes that will go to the top of the search results.
- waihtis 3y agosearch is dying anyway and this will just accelerate that trend.
- Planktonne 3y ago> LLMs are too dumb to be useful, but smart enough to be destructive. I think this puts the blame in the wrong place; LLMs are too dumb to be useful, but it's the users who are too dumb to realise that, or too unethical to care.
- uoaei 3y agoIt's also the creators, hosters, and startup founders who are overselling its capabilities.
- Planktonne 3y agoI was lumping them in with 'users'; I don't think the evangelists are any less credulous than their marks.