4 ms·

If fake those researchers careers are over. Like, they'll have to go into programming or something. And they've also besmirched the good name of Korea, and thei

If fake those researchers careers are over. Like, they'll have to go into programming or something. And they've also besmirched the good name of Korea, and their moms are going to beat the shit out of them for fucking up that bad. They've got a LOT to lose if this is fake, which is why I think it's most likely true. But hey, sometimes people just do crazy shit.

ldjkfkdsjnv 3y ago
Impossible, wall street has some of the smartest scientists on the planet. They absolutely went through the research and determined it was a fake. Look at the AI boom, nasdaq rallied 40%. Superconductor would have had the same effect
- delabay 3y ago
  Like how the markets caught on to Covid in early February 2020? China shutting down, drowning in body bags, yet US markets don't flinch.
- ssa_form 3y ago
  Yes but LK-99 is practically unusable in current form if it's a superconductor. There needs to be a lot more material science research before it can be put into utopian use cases that everyone is dreaming about. Recent AI boom brought a lot more finished products which can be immediately put to use.
- r0m4n0 3y ago
  Yea all those geniuses missed COVID completely though. And then the market overreacted in every way possible causing a crash then a rally that compared to nothing we have seen. Not sure the stock market tells us much of anything
- sottol 3y ago
  squints... can't tell if this is sarcasm. Microstrategy is still trading at like 2x their BTC holdings and so on and so forth, the AI boom is still in-progress and imo the jury is still out on the actual, real-world and $ implications... I think it's sarcasm.
- pie420 3y ago
  You know how there was a dotcom boom? Well the AI boom is just a repeat. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Save this comment and revist it in 5 years.
  - zzbn00 3y ago
    "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." somewhere I read the a good addition to this: "and those who do know history are doomed to watch it being repeated"
- lessaligned 3y ago
  ...nothing happened to the markets ~2017 when the transformer architecture (behind the current AI boom) happened. Nor in 2020 when it was pretty obvious shit scales and generalizes well. ONLY when it got built into an actual product (ChatGPT) did the needle start to move. Same with this, until someone figures out how to make WIRES from LK-99-like-stuff that can be made into useful MAGNETS, it will stay flat. Markets may be very smart... but they're hyyyyyper-conservative :P (an it makes sense to be so, there's the $$$ powering agriculture and healthcare and pensions floating on the seas of markets nowadays).
  - ldjkfkdsjnv 3y ago
    Transformers in 2017 basically were just better at computing similarities between blocks of text. OpenAI really did take them and turn them into something new.
    - lessaligned 3y ago
      "room-temp semiconductors in 2023 were just small blocks of stuff levitating atop magnets without needing to be cooled. XYZ really did manage to produce them into useful shapes that still remain superconductive when you push more than 0.00001 amps through them"
squeaky-clean 3y ago
The paper was leaked by someone fired from the team months prior. The researchers still active were not satisfied with the state of their paper.

ldjkfkdsjnv 3y ago

Impossible, wall street has some of the smartest scientists on the planet. They absolutely went through the research and determined it was a fake. Look at the AI boom, nasdaq rallied 40%. Superconductor would have had the same effect

delabay 3y ago
Like how the markets caught on to Covid in early February 2020? China shutting down, drowning in body bags, yet US markets don't flinch.
ssa_form 3y ago
Yes but LK-99 is practically unusable in current form if it's a superconductor. There needs to be a lot more material science research before it can be put into utopian use cases that everyone is dreaming about. Recent AI boom brought a lot more finished products which can be immediately put to use.
r0m4n0 3y ago
Yea all those geniuses missed COVID completely though. And then the market overreacted in every way possible causing a crash then a rally that compared to nothing we have seen. Not sure the stock market tells us much of anything
sottol 3y ago
squints... can't tell if this is sarcasm. Microstrategy is still trading at like 2x their BTC holdings and so on and so forth, the AI boom is still in-progress and imo the jury is still out on the actual, real-world and $ implications... I think it's sarcasm.
pie420 3y ago
You know how there was a dotcom boom? Well the AI boom is just a repeat. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Save this comment and revist it in 5 years.
- zzbn00 3y ago
  "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." somewhere I read the a good addition to this: "and those who do know history are doomed to watch it being repeated"
lessaligned 3y ago
...nothing happened to the markets ~2017 when the transformer architecture (behind the current AI boom) happened. Nor in 2020 when it was pretty obvious shit scales and generalizes well. ONLY when it got built into an actual product (ChatGPT) did the needle start to move. Same with this, until someone figures out how to make WIRES from LK-99-like-stuff that can be made into useful MAGNETS, it will stay flat. Markets may be very smart... but they're hyyyyyper-conservative :P (an it makes sense to be so, there's the $$$ powering agriculture and healthcare and pensions floating on the seas of markets nowadays).
- ldjkfkdsjnv 3y ago
  Transformers in 2017 basically were just better at computing similarities between blocks of text. OpenAI really did take them and turn them into something new.
  - lessaligned 3y ago
    "room-temp semiconductors in 2023 were just small blocks of stuff levitating atop magnets without needing to be cooled. XYZ really did manage to produce them into useful shapes that still remain superconductive when you push more than 0.00001 amps through them"

squeaky-clean 3y ago

The paper was leaked by someone fired from the team months prior. The researchers still active were not satisfied with the state of their paper.