4 ms·
Sure, but we already have Linux (and FreeBSD and NetBSD and...). So if your argument for something new is reliability, you're arguing inherently-potentially-mor
by ketralnis 15y ago
Sure, but we already have Linux (and FreeBSD and NetBSD and...). So if your argument for something new is reliability, you're arguing inherently-potentially-more-reliable vs in-practise-already-quite-reliable and haven't shown us what we gain by going with you vs them.
- cynicalkane 15y agoThe usual arguments in a language or OS flame war are relevant here. Do you choose the allegedly superior design, or the more popular and practiced one? The answer depends on your use case, love of tinkering, tolerance for productivity risk. But were it not for people trying new designs, we'd all be writing code in assembly language on single-user systems.