4 ms·
but like.. objectively what he does is bad. I wish there were a smaller bandwagon to bandwagon-onto.
by throwaway914 3y ago
but like.. objectively what he does is bad. I wish there were a smaller bandwagon to bandwagon-onto.
- uristohkrat 3y agoExpand upon your idea: 'but like.. objectively what he does is bad'
- gscho 3y agoNot the OP but we could mention that time where he called a hero a pedophile or when he bought twitter to promote free speech and then banned anyone who said negative things about him. No one human should have 260 billion dollars and be thought of as a good person unless they do a ton of philanthropy.
- upon_drumhead 3y agogreater then 259 billion dollars of philanthropy
- NotSuspicious 3y agoNow, I'm not saying this is the case for Musk, but surely if a person that rich was heavily investing in technological research that resulted in positive feedback loops that benefitted humankind then they would be a pretty good person, right? Who was really a better person: Mother Teresa or Norman Borlaug?
- edgyquant 3y agoNone of this is objective
- throwaway914 3y agoObjectively it is bad to defame and distract from a public servant rescuing kids from a cave. (Objectively.)
- redavni 3y agoBecause all the other humans throughout history that launched a car they built, on a rocket they built did it better, right? To be fair, I am actually still annoyed about the whole x.com thing. They closed my account when they sold to Paypal 23 years ago now. Now it is just some message board.
- hypeit 3y ago> Because all the other humans throughout history that launched a car they built, on a rocket they built did it better, right? Musk has never built a car or a rocket. He raises money and hypes things. He is not a builder. Hell, he tried to get Paypal to switch to Windows because he doesn't even understand Linux.