4 ms·
I tested SDXL this weekend with stable-diffusion-webui and I wasn't impressed. There are multiple SD1.5 checkpoints that were much better at generating pics of
by itake 3y ago
I tested SDXL this weekend with stable-diffusion-webui and I wasn't impressed. There are multiple SD1.5 checkpoints that were much better at generating pics of humans.
Is this issue that SDXL needs more fine tuning for it to be useful and it will be better than SD1.5 once it is?
- dragonwriter 3y ago> Is this issue that SDXL needs more fine tuning for it to be useful and it will be better than SD1.5 once it is? No, its that SDXL is better than SD1.5 right now, but some SD1.5-derived-checkpoints are still better than base SDXL, at least foe their focal use cases. There are already a bunch of SDXL-derived checkpoints, but obviously not as much effort yet into them as SD1.5 (though a lot more being pumped out than ever happened for SD2.x). (Also, while I think some of the forks do, base stable-diffusion-web-ui doesn’t have a built-in workflow that uses the SDXL refiner model, to get full SDXL effect you have to generate with the base model and separately do img2img with the refiner model.)
- itake 3y agoAre there any SDXL opensource codebase (or self-hosted apis) that support LORA models?
- dragonwriter 3y agoBoth stable-diffusion-web-ui and ComfyUI support SDXL with LoRa models.