3 ms·

I'm sorry but i fail to see how this is _simple_ networking. It shows the state of Linux these days. Compare that with OpenBSD's interface to do the same thing.

I'm sorry but i fail to see how this is _simple_ networking. It shows the state of Linux these days. Compare that with OpenBSD's interface to do the same thing. wired: ifconfig [if] autoconf up wireless: ifconfig [if] join [ssid] wpakey [pass] autoconf up Consistent documentation existing in man ifconfig. The sad thing is that Linux used to be designed not evolved.

raffraffraff 3y ago
I agree that it's not simple, but systemd networkd is far simpler than network configuration has been on Linux for a long time.
- blueflow 3y ago
  Its not simpler, its more complex than ever. Its only easier to use.
  - invrlrn 3y ago
    [dead]
  - thatguy27 3y ago
    "Simple Made Easy" - Rich Hickey (2011) [0] explains the difference. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxdOUGdseq4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxdOUGdseq4
Arnavion 3y ago
You can use `ifconfig` / `ip link` if you want. The submitted article is about having systemd-networkd manage it.
- ramrunner0xff 3y ago
  i would also need wpa_supplicant for the wifi though. i would also need to install ifconfig or iptools and making sure that systemd/network-network manager respects my config. I would also need to figure out the interface's name-du-jour or add udev rules to force a name of my preference. I hope you see my point.