4 ms·
Given the Max 8 debacle [0], I'd agree we don't seem to have many great rules around this. [0] https://apnews.com/article/boeing-max-crashes-faa-ea8fac0ad2758b
by windexh8er 3y ago
Given the Max 8 debacle [0], I'd agree we don't seem to have many great rules around this.
[0] https://apnews.com/article/boeing-max-crashes-faa-ea8fac0ad2758b08c58d2d64756fbf37 https://apnews.com/article/boeing-max-crashes-faa-ea8fac0ad2...
- mulmen 3y agoThe difference in this case is that when the Max-8s crashed they were no longer airworthy and were not re-flown.
- mannykannot 3y agoAfter the 2nd. one.
- mulmen 3y agoNone of the crashed 737 MAX-8s were ever re-flown. This is a conversation about re-flying air frames that have been involved in fatalities. Air frames here means the planes, not the model. The 737 Max-8 is a cautionary tale about a lot of things, but re-flying crashed airframes is not one of the lessons.
- mannykannot 3y agoYou are right - my mistake.