> People who want to debate objective facts are not worth talking to. Then don’t. But that’s not a “conversation”. That’s just lecturing. Also: Who is the a

> People who want to debate objective facts are not worth talking to. Then don’t. But that’s not a “conversation”. That’s just lecturing. Also: Who is the arbiter of what is, and isn’t “objective” truth? Reasonable people sometimes differ. Also also: The “truth” in this case was “the word ‘groper’ is always offensive, no matter where it is used”. Which I certainly could see reasonable people disagree with. But nope, that obviously merited a straight block.