> That's a mis-characterization of what's going on here. it's not. it's a point made in a much more generalized context of discussion. we're mixing different

> That's a mis-characterization of what's going on here. it's not. it's a point made in a much more generalized context of discussion. we're mixing different levels of generalization in this discussion, hence the discussion is broken and useless. there's no redhat, there is only IBM.