6 ms·
Bordeaux should be a climate change red flag for the wine industry
- dextersgenius 3y agoAnyone else saw the title and thought that Bordeaux, the Wine front-end, made a comeback or something?
- CydeWeys 3y agoIs this article AI-generated? If so, I feel like my time has been abused, as it keeps restating the same points over and over.
- upon_drumhead 3y agoThe domain is softwine.ai, so I think it is From their about us: > is this an AI-generated site? > Parts are, but not really. And I get it, AI is a controversial topic - so here's my disclaimer: > First off - all written content on softwine is created by me. Some is aided by LLM technologies, but only with the highest level of skepticism, creative intent, and editing.
- js8 3y ago> Some is aided by LLM technologies, but only with the highest level of skepticism, creative intent, and editing. I just watched Adam Savage on YT giving advice to youtubers. He said if you get bored editing a segment, but think your audience will appreciate it, you're wrong and you should cut it out. I think the same is true for AI. If you think your audience will appreciate some AI rambling, but you don't, you're probably mistaken.
- mrodd805 3y agoThis article is not - unfortunately just the writing style of an amateur blogger who always paid more attention in university science than in writing courses haha
- rco8786 3y agosoftwine.ai
- rngname22 3y agoThe enshittification of online discussion and content starts with the same morons who thought it was a good idea to speak into a megaphone when they had nothing interesting to say to hear the sound of their own voice now being capable of doing so with an AI writing their uselessness to be spoken into the megaphone. Kind of an even worse version of this comment I'm writing right now.
- frank_bb 3y ago[dead]
- ldehaan 3y ago[dead]
- cde-v 3y agoJust wait for spotted lanternflies to take hold, they will devastate grape crops.
- the_doctah 3y agoClimate change propaganda is going extra hard in the last 6 months I've noticed.
- regularjack 3y agosigh
- cykotic 3y agoI think the question ought to be why is your belief on the matter not the result of propaganda in the reverse direction? When you believe something that the overwhelming majority of experts disagree with then it seems it’s much more likely you are the victim of propaganda. If 97% of the world’s oncologists say you have cancer then it’s likely you have cancer. Believing otherwise is deranged.
- the_doctah 3y agoMust have to do with Covid and trusting the "experts" who turned out to be a bunch of frauds and liars.
- slily 3y agoOne doesn't have to fundamentally disagree with the existence of an issue like climate change in order to notice it warping into mass hysteria. Having lived through several such episodes I've given up convincing people that it is, in fact, mass hysteria, since people who don't see it right away never admit it until it winds down. I just hope we don't kill too many people with the "degrowth" idiocy which is fueled by flimsy doomerist predictions that are only loosely based on legitimate science but mostly pushed by entities with political and/or financial interests.
- acdha 3y agoI can’t help but notice the accusation of hysteria is backed by a conspicuous lack of evidence or meaningful policy proposals whereas the people you’re attacking have both decades of data, accurate predictions, and detailed policies which have been heavily analyzed.