@dang I think worth to place the year (1993) on the post. ... It's quite refreshing to see some results of this competition specially in comparison with the M

@dang I think worth to place the year (1993) on the post. ... It's quite refreshing to see some results of this competition specially in comparison with the M5 that is the most relevant competition in time series. For practitioners one thing that is important to consider is that this competition had datasets with way longer time intervals (I think M5 has a lot of time series but in a short horizon) and the methods used back in the day was way more sophisticated.