4 ms·
> not a big company piling gobs of money into a full-time team Think this is a bit of a straw man, to be honest. I've done turns at AWS, Microsoft, Dropbox, an
by jwestbury 3y ago
> not a big company piling gobs of money into a full-time team
Think this is a bit of a straw man, to be honest. I've done turns at AWS, Microsoft, Dropbox, and now a quant fund. Most of the big-impact projects at all of these places have been bottom-up initiatives, not top-down -- they've been things started by one or a couple people, wedged into spare time, because the existing ecosystem had gaps. Even things that turn into full-fledged, public-facing services usually start quite small. A former teammate at AWS was part of the team who launched Mac on EC2 -- he was the third engineer on the team, and he started on the project as a part-time engineer on loan from another team. In my experience, this is how things are usually built -- even for things that go on to be part of the re:Invent keynote.
- adhesive_wombat 3y agoMaybe for some software, but rarely for anything involving hardware unless you're dummying it up on an Arduino. The hardware platforms I've worked would handily incinerate my entire household net worth in a year or so and relentlessly consume full time attention.
- bawolff 3y agoEven a part time engineer on loan is probably more time than some dude's weekend. But i think part of it is how fast things can be scaled up. Corporations can go from the tiny to large scale fast of things look good. It takes a lot of time for open source to build momentum.