4 ms·

Do you also think it is odd that news consumers would then want to possibly discuss or share the news with people they know? Because that's the reason. Folks i

Do you also think it is odd that news consumers would then want to possibly discuss or share the news with people they know? Because that's the reason. Folks interested in news tend to talk about it with other folks interested - and that has happened long before the internet. In some cases, it is pretty similar to leaving a newspaper in a fast food place: Let folks you don't see much (or at all) read that stuff as well. It doesn't always matter if other options are better - folks work with what they have. Similar to wanting to talk to someone more intelligent about the news, but still talking about it with the folks you have around.

xp84 3y ago
> news consumers would then want to possibly discuss or share the news with people they know? I don’t witness that happening though. When I see “news” posted by people on FB, I usually see a despairing one-line intro at most, and a link. Then the comments are a bunch of me-toos or, for those with unkempt friend lists of everyone they’ve ever met, a raucous flame war. The other “news” is posted by the sites themselves or by large political Pages or Groups. Those are exclusively the “flame war” variety, 1000 strangers screaming into the void pointlessly. So (imo) nothing of value would be lost by abolishing the whole concept of news on social media. If you want a place where sane people can have a virtual water cooler discussion about the day’s news stories with friends they know, those friends should just set up a group text or a Discord.