3 ms·
> I use exactly that way of error handling and I find it scales very very well and makes refactoring a breeze. The enormous number of Rust crates that attempt
by foldr 3y ago
> I use exactly that way of error handling and I find it scales very very well and makes refactoring a breeze.
The enormous number of Rust crates that attempt to automate various aspects of defining error types suggests that not everyone finds it so pleasant.
- valenterry 3y agoPlease read my post again, especially the last part...
- foldr 3y agoI have read your post. Apologies if I’ve misunderstood it, but just replying in that way doesn’t really help.
- valenterry 3y agoI'm confused because I didn't say that Rust makes refactoring a breeze right? In fact, I said it does the opposite. So I don't really understand your response.
- foldr 3y agoAh, I read "I use exactly that way of error handling..." as "I use exactly that way of error handling [in Rust]..." (given the post you were replying to), but I guess you were talking about Zig. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
- valenterry 3y agoHaha, I'm actually using neither Rust nor Zig and I think both don't support the way of error-handling that I described. No worries, happens. :)