3 ms·
I agree that NATO is not the vehicle for US world domination. NATO is hard to understand. It is a complicated organization without a clear course and it is esp
by hackandthink 3y ago
I agree that NATO is not the vehicle for US world domination.
NATO is hard to understand. It is a complicated organization without a clear course and it is especially not a pure defense alliance (Afghanistan, Kosovo, Ukraine).
Some members try to push their own questionable agenda (NATO expansion to asia) and the organization has a life of its own (mission creep).
NATO's success also exacerbates the security dilemma, which its own self-righteousness cannot see.
In my opinion, NATO should limit itself to an actual pure defensive alliance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_dilemma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_dilemma
- _kbh_ 3y ago> NATO is hard to understand. It is a complicated organization without a clear course and it is especially not a pure defense alliance (Afghanistan, Kosovo, Ukraine). Is NATO actually in Ukraine attacking Russia, or is NATO helping Ukraine defend itself from Russia. I think it’s entirely reasonable for a defensive alliance to arm a country to defend itself from an invader. It’s literally the point of NATO, to counter Russian aggression.