> Who decides which expert to listen to? Because we have experts on both sides of this issue. The representatives you elect. If you're not happy, you can try t

> Who decides which expert to listen to? Because we have experts on both sides of this issue. The representatives you elect. If you're not happy, you can try to hold them accountable or elect someone else. I acknowledge this isn't perfect, but it's what the system is right now. > The reality is that building anti-asteroid orbital defence is cheaper, faster, more versatile, and plain easier than building a base on the moon. Since I provided reasoning for my opinion, would you care to do these same, as opposed to stating it as fact?