2 ms·
You'd be wrong, of course. The dynamic range of the film was out of their control. And, not shockingly, a lot of lessons film companies learned were lost in th
by taeric 3y ago
You'd be wrong, of course. The dynamic range of the film was out of their control. And, not shockingly, a lot of lessons film companies learned were lost in the transition to digital. Or rather, they are taking time to spread there.
Is annoying, as it is not a conspiracy. It is hard, though, and we see the speed of knowledge spread more now. Or, rather, the relative lack of speed.
- staticautomatic 3y agoWhat a red herring. Whether or not the photographer controls the dynamic range of the film has nothing to do with whether the range is wide enough or whether the film has a density curve suitable for photographing a black person.
- taeric 3y agoBut it has a very real impact on the settings you have to use otherwise to get a good shot? That is, I'm mostly inclined to agree with you. But I also trusted a ton of the other discussion I've seen on this. Which seems to be largely in agreement that film itself had to change to get good pictures of darker skinned people. I got the impression that if you go with black and white, you dodge many of these problems, amusingly. But adding color to the mix makes things very difficult.