Well, I don't have all the answers for every industry, but the broad strokes as what I said. Utility tokens really only work when you need services of other peo

Well, I don't have all the answers for every industry, but the broad strokes as what I said. Utility tokens really only work when you need services of other people in a network, often requested and delivered over a network. They aren't really as useful for software that you can run locally on your computer. So, for example, hosting RedHat software on an Amazon instance, RedHat can work with Amazon to make sure it enforces licensing fees. If Amazon doesn't then RedHat can, theoretically, sue the company or pull its licensing for any further instances, hurting both companies. But RedHat could launch a new product line centering around servers running their machines, "commoditizing their complements", and doing jobs. Kind of like Adobe turned to SaaS instead of software running on your computer. Or how wordpress.com makes the bulk of the money for Automattic instead of self-hosted Wordpress. They'd have to start managing infrastructure, basically, or partner with Amazon as they already do. I guess my overall point is that more software should be funded in the beginning using utility tokens, so they never get a big shareholder class and thus never have to go IPO to generate a return. Thus they never have to impress investors on Wall Street earnings calls, by how many rents they've extracted from their ecosystem via greater enshittification.