I don't agree. A published article should not be taken for Gods Truth no matter if it's replicated or peer reviewed. Lots of "replicated" "peer-reviewed" resea

I don't agree. A published article should not be taken for Gods Truth no matter if it's replicated or peer reviewed. Lots of "replicated" "peer-reviewed" research have been found to be wrong. That's fine, it's part of the process of discovery. A paper should be taken for what it is: a piece of scientific work, a part of a puzzle.