3 ms·

I like the idea of Rust, the tooling, the package manager (far more better that what you can find in C++). What you are saying is true: I've been writing high

I like the idea of Rust, the tooling, the package manager (far more better that what you can find in C++). What you are saying is true: I've been writing high performance scientific code and desktop gui apps. I would love to use Rust for my projects, but it just doesn't cut it. The libraries I am using are very mature in C++, but the libraries in Rust to accomplish the same thing are still too immature to consider in my projects.

jenadine 3y ago
Out of curiosity, what are these libraries that are missing equivalent in Rust? Also, can you not use these libraries from Rust?
- pjmlp 3y ago
  Not the OP, however here goes a quick sample. Anything related to HPC and HFT, CUDA, game engines (Unreal/CryEngine/Ogre3D/Godot vs Bevy), Qt/WinUI/MFC/VCL/FireMonkey/wxWidgets/KDE, COM/XPC/Binder, compiler frameworks (Graal/GCC/LLVM). Yes, many of those could be used from Rust, some of them already are, provided there are bindings, then again it is the classical question if one wants to maintain bindings, or write the application they care about.