3 ms·
Then those unconfirmed results are better put on arxiv, instead of being used to evaluate the performance of scientists. Tenure and grant committees should only
by dongping 3y ago
Then those unconfirmed results are better put on arxiv, instead of being used to evaluate the performance of scientists. Tenure and grant committees should only consider replicated work.
- geysersam 3y agoI don't agree. A published article should not be taken for Gods Truth no matter if it's replicated or peer reviewed. Lots of "replicated" "peer-reviewed" research have been found to be wrong. That's fine, it's part of the process of discovery. A paper should be taken for what it is: a piece of scientific work, a part of a puzzle.