I don't see any problem with the tool itself; the problem is that it's being used incorrectly and with false assumptions. A facial recognition match should jus

I don't see any problem with the tool itself; the problem is that it's being used incorrectly and with false assumptions. A facial recognition match should just be the start of one possible line of inquiry, and nothing more. I think the real issue is that the US justice system rewards and penalizes based on the number of convictions achieved. Low = bad, high = good. But high convictions does not equate to promoting justice or domestic tranquility.