3 ms·
So the remaining traffic would be all expenses, no profit? Doesn't sound like capitalism anymore then, more of a public service.
by halflings 3y ago
So the remaining traffic would be all expenses, no profit? Doesn't sound like capitalism anymore then, more of a public service.
- shadowgovt 3y agoImagine a government creating a search engine as a public service. ... Oh wait, that's actually a great idea and I want to see that happen.
- halflings 3y agoSure, then advocate for your government to build a public search engine. Why do you need to penalize private institutions if users prefer to use them over a government service?
- xcdzvyn 3y agoI, personally, am very, _very_ glad my country doesn't oblige me to use a state-sponsored search engine. Baidu "六四事件"[0] to find out more! [0] "June Fourth incident", the Chinese name for the Tiananmen square massacre. Other banned search terms include "candle", "never forget", and the numbers 25 and 64.
- shadowgovt 3y agoI wasn't imagining one would be obliged. Merely that as a demonstrated vital good in modern society, it's something a government could, perhaps, guarantee a minimum standard on. Ad-free tax-funded search would be kind of neat.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- _8j50 3y agoYou know, even with Google amd Bing, search terms are extremely (even politically) censored depending on where you search from. It's not like Chinese users can search the same thing fine on Google.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- _8j50 3y agoIt would be expenses and profit, the remaining traffic keeps users coming.