No, it simply hints that pricing wasn't always an issue, not that it isn't an issue. The quick way to find out is - if they could make a good profit selling th

No, it simply hints that pricing wasn't always an issue, not that it isn't an issue. The quick way to find out is - if they could make a good profit selling the entire set for $x where $x < $current, would they still be doing it? The answer is yes. The reason the price used to work and doesn't now is that digital equivilents are not only (subjectively) better/easier/etc. - they're also cheaper.