>Peer review does not serve to assure replication, but assure readability and comprehensibility of the paper. I have had a paper rejected twice in a row over t

>Peer review does not serve to assure replication, but assure readability and comprehensibility of the paper. I have had a paper rejected twice in a row over the last year. Both times the comments include something like "paper was very well-wriiten; well-written enough that an undergrad could read it". Peer review ensures the gates are kept.