4 ms·
I saw this on Dribbble a few weeks ago: http://dribbble.com/shots/423934-This-Means-Markdown http://dribbble.com/shots/423934-This-Means-Markdown Another nice
by gurraman 15y ago
I saw this on Dribbble a few weeks ago:
http://dribbble.com/shots/423934-This-Means-Markdown http://dribbble.com/shots/423934-This-Means-Markdown
Another nice one:
http://dribbble.com/shots/424152-Markdown http://dribbble.com/shots/424152-Markdown
- tzaman 15y agoThe second one is much nicer than Dustin's
- dcurtis 15y agoAt first glance, the second one might appear to be a better mark. However, if you don't know what it stands for, or that the top part of it is an M, the graphic is just an ordinary arrow. It doesn't accomplish the primary goal of the design. It definitely looks nice, though.
- nhebb 15y agoI didn't even notice that the top formed an M until you mentioned it, so there you go.
- nicpottier 15y agoGood logos don't beat you over the head with what they mean. The original version is pretty amateur in that respect IMO, it is almost the first thing anybody would come up with. Having a bit of delight and 'aha!' in a logo is a good thing.
- Mjux 15y agobringing in the meaning literally to the face. I would keep http://dribbble.com/ http://dribbble.com/ shots/423934-This-Means- Markdown Embedding the context doesn't help with the second one. encoding with the first one solves them. Dustin, how would this keep the context in application and web?