3 ms·
"The company doesn't have any obligation to share high earnings with their employee. " I never suggested that they do. In fact, I think I rather explicitly arg
by dionidium 18y ago
"The company doesn't have any obligation to share high earnings with their employee. "
I never suggested that they do. In fact, I think I rather explicitly argued that they paid those wages because it was the best deal they could negotiate at the time. If they could have negotiated a better deal, they would have.
More generally, if I agree to do a certain amount of work for a certain pay, it does not imply that I deserve that pay (whatever that means). But surely it means that the person paying me thinks that wage (considering the alternatives) to be in their best interest.
"If they don't like it, they can get another job that pays them market wages or treats them better."
Or collectively negotiate better wages?
- fallentimes 18y agoRight, but you asked why they didn't. If they collectively negotiate above market wages the company will die in the long term.