3 ms·
Nuclear Power would have been the solution. There are ways to even reduce the radioactivity of the waste that are technically feasible. Though I am not against
by anshumankmr 3y ago
Nuclear Power would have been the solution. There are ways to even reduce the radioactivity of the waste that are technically feasible. Though I am not against renewables at all, I love solar as well, we have a solar powered water heating system in my apartment.
- myshpa 3y agoA single solution won't suffice. That could have worked 50-70 years ago, not now. Climate change, resource depletion, deforestation, loss of biodiversity, pollution, overpopulation, soil erosion, and overfishing are all symptoms of ecological overshoot. Agriculture is a key culprit in 5-6 out of 8-9 of those symptoms, and animal ag accounts for 80% of all agriculture. Nuclear will/should help with the climate change, but will do very little in other areas. And we should solve most of them, otherwise we're still ... in a bad place. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_overshoot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_overshoot https://phys.org/news/2023-04-climate-crisis-biodiversity-approached.html https://phys.org/news/2023-04-climate-crisis-biodiversity-ap... The climate crisis and biodiversity crisis can't be approached separately, says study