3 ms·
I'd say he's almost too particular for an M with a down arrow in a rounded rectangle. However, what's the corner radius? What's the width of the stroke on the
by DHowett 15y ago
I'd say he's almost too particular for an M with a down arrow in a rounded rectangle.
However, what's the corner radius? What's the width of the stroke on the M? The depth of the point of the arrow or the width of its sweep?
It seems like he's got the spacing and sizing of line-width elements specified to a 'T' (or an 'X' as the case may be), but can we typeset the M in, say, Times? Can the down arrow be a chevron instead?
Particular, but if he's going for particular he's taking it nearly far enough. :P
- unwind 15y agoThanks, I was confused by the strange mix of very clear specs and no specs while referencing the absent specs, too. Bullet points 1 and 2, for instance: 1. Do not change the aspect ratio of the rounded box enclosure. 2. Do not change the border radius of the rounded box enclosure. Neither of these properties were defined as far as I could see. Perhaps it's one of those cases where you're expected to "see" it from the graphics; I typically don't operate well that way. :)
- adavies42 15y agoalso there's at least two more measurements missing from the spec graphic--the distance between the M and the arrow and the distance between the arrow and the right edge. i assume those are both X, but it doesn't actually say....