Where does that 4x come from? This should be noticeable on the simple computer simulation that I made. It wasn't. When I "focused" the camera on a galaxy that h

Where does that 4x come from? This should be noticeable on the simple computer simulation that I made. It wasn't. When I "focused" the camera on a galaxy that had average speed it looked exactly as if it was the epicenter of the whole system if I limted my range of view to end right before the edge. With 4x assymetry in density I should be able to easily tell where the true epicenter was. I couldn't. I'm sure I could use some probability distribution that would show that effect, also gravity could make it more pronounced but uniform distribution without gravity was perfectly symmetrical. My other argument is that if big bang didn't start in a single point then the real centerpoint of it might have never been inside the bubble of our observable universe due to speed of light and space-time expansions as the galaxies moved away. CMB is just the image of hot matter that was close to our location 13bn years ago. Same as faint, highly redshifted images of galaxies from nearly that time. Redshift is mostly from the speed of that matter relative to us back then and spacetime expanding as it was "dragged" by the matter since then. CMB is unique in a sense that it is the image of the last time when all matter around us was so hot and dense that it was opaque. But it doesn't need any special mechanism and it's radiation is no different from our point of view than light from old galaxies.