We might be talking past each other. I'm not talking about first origins. I don't care where a tribe originally came from. I skimmed your paper and don't think

We might be talking past each other. I'm not talking about first origins. I don't care where a tribe originally came from. I skimmed your paper and don't think it disproved anything I said. Let's take this simple scenario. There is some uninhabited land. Nobody has ever lived on the land before. A tribe ends up moving to the area. Something happens and the tribe decides to split into two. The land is also split. A short time later (prior to any DNA changes) one tribe attacks the other and takes the other tribe's land. The idea that DNA can prove that never happened of that is utterly ridiculous. I skimmed through the paper and it didn't suggest that it could. Please point to the page where it says DNA can prove a tribe never attacked another tribe.