The important principle is that people should be generally free to do what they want in public if it’s not harming others. It’s natural that it becomes more dif

The important principle is that people should be generally free to do what they want in public if it’s not harming others. It’s natural that it becomes more difficult to decide how to apply that principle when you begin talking about vague notions of harm, or potential harm, or harm that’s dependent on the personality or opinions of the person potentially being harmed. Edit: I meant for this to be a reply to the parent comment.