"Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell." ~ Edward Abbey What irks me is lots of products are "done" but continue to receive pointles

"Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell." ~ Edward Abbey What irks me is lots of products are "done" but continue to receive pointless changes - whether that be UX changes, half-backed features, or regressions in functionality. And for what? So the marketing department has something to market, so engineers can justify their continued employment? This problem isn't limited to the business world either. Even in the open source community there is a tendency to assume that if a project isn't receiving regular code changes, then it must be "dead" or "unsupported" when in actuality it _might_ be a sign the project is mature and stable.