3 ms·
Oh, of course! SEP’s summary is pretty readable. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal/#ClaMec https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-ca
by Cushman 3y ago
Oh, of course! SEP’s summary is pretty readable. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal/#ClaMec https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal/#ClaMe... Past that you’ll probably need to read the papers, it’s very niche.
Sorry, I should have remembered that’s not actually an easy google :)
- crazygringo 3y agoThanks for that! What a fascinating set of problems. It is interesting that all of the ones listed in that section involve either infinities or infinitesimally small points -- except for Norton's dome. Which really makes it a great example for that reason.
- Cushman 3y agoYeah, exactly! You can see why the dome is the famous one, even though it’s the most recent. Previously there were models to finitize whatever term one was worried about specifically, but they all had an infinity somewhere. Even since Cantor, that makes philosophers antsy. The dome is analogous to a loophole-free Bell test— most people already accept the conclusion, so it’s not a surprising result, but having it in one simple argument closes the door to a lot of nitpicking.