3 ms·
Thank you for engaging. I have no problem with slower or more introspective stories, mind you. But even if I accept the notion that Earthsea is about wizardry
by pdimitar 3y ago
Thank you for engaging.
I have no problem with slower or more introspective stories, mind you. But even if I accept the notion that Earthsea is about wizardry being more about observing and a holistic approach (which I can accept easily) I still got disappointed because there was barely any magic, and it did not move the plot. There was no conflict, factions, clashes of interests etc.
Part of the answer lies within myself as you pointed out: though I more mean in the sense that my life has not been easy, and dark thoughts and introspection have taken plenty of time from it, so I absolutely cannot get fascinated by these things in books.
If you don't mind the sex analogy, this is very similar to assertive and dominant people usually needing to be submissive in sex to get off. It's like this: you got plenty of X in other areas of life and you don't want X in your free time as well. You need Y and Z.
So I can mostly hypothesize that's why I don't like the books. I get part of the philosophy but... I wanted some magic, man. :)
- at_a_remove 3y agoMight I suggest, then, most of The Black Company series? Magic. Magic used in ways you might not imagine. I count myself a veteran of the Battle of the Stair at Tear, because goddamn, I felt like I was there.
- pdimitar 3y agoOhhh, Glen Cook! This guy is in my "to check" shelf for way too long. Gotta get around to him. Thanks for reminding me.
- at_a_remove 3y agoI am well-versed in the prolific Cook. He's a hometown boy for me and I met him ages ago. He has other series, like the Dread Empire, but I think you might like my suggestion the best.
- aeontech 3y agoHah, I wouldn't have thought of the recommendation, but I'll be damned if that's not the most apt total inverse opposite to Le Guin's style in Earthsea I could hope to think of. Perfect!