What I mean to say is, why is it a foregone conclusion that this is the correct approach? Why shouldn't we accept that in cases like this, some people do things

What I mean to say is, why is it a foregone conclusion that this is the correct approach? Why shouldn't we accept that in cases like this, some people do things that all but guarantee they will become part of the natural processes that surround us constantly? It's not like grizzlies have any great cultural animosity against humans, or that they have a good enough idea of what the situation is outside of their habitual ranges to plan some grandiose gestures to try to beat back the encroachment of humans. They're just doing what they've always done, and in contrast to humans the grizzly way seems to keep ecosystems more or less healthy.