3 ms·
I would posit the opposite, language exists to be combined in any number of ways easily and still communicate well. A language that cannot do this does not I th
by TuringTourist 3y ago
I would posit the opposite, language exists to be combined in any number of ways easily and still communicate well. A language that cannot do this does not I think exist.
- glenstein 3y agoSame. I find it hard to makes sense of why anyone would claim that computers can innovate visually but not with language. It would make more sense if someone at least felt that they both could, or both couldn't.